State v. Haynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he legislature frequently specifies what a statutory term definitely includes and also provides a general definition of what the term means apart from those things specifically enumerated. \ (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boyd v. Essin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-18· cited 41×
• State v. Pamperien
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-30· cited 14×
• Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-12· cited 13×
• State v. Courtier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 7×
• Edwards v. Riverdale School District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-18· cited 7×
• Pilgrim v. Clatskanie People's Utility District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-16· cited 6×
• Diaz v. Coyle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-28· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-06· cited 42×
• State v. Huntley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-12-30· cited 38×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Roff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-12-14· cited 1×