Skip to main content

State v. Couch

Citations

  • 720 P.2d 1387
  • 44 Wash. App. 26
  • 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing \fenced area\ in RCW 9A.04.110(5) although the case did not concern a fenced area
  • discussing “fenced area” in RCW 9A.04.110(5) although the case did not concern a fenced area
  • finding sufficient evidence to infer intent to commit a crime where defendant entered surreptitiously and took flight upon discovery
  • pushing up trap door from below constitutes entry into upper level
  • upholding conviction of second-degree burglary of building; finding basement of building part of the building as it was enclosed, associated with the building, and used in connection with the building — statute, however, pro vided broader definition of building
  • sufficient evidence found to support inference of criminal intent when defendant entered unlawfully, fled immediately upon being found, and offered a lame or improbable story for being in the area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.