Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/13/1986
State v. Lira
Citations
- 726 P.2d 1015
- 45 Wash. App. 653
- 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing title-level \building\ definition applies to burglary statute under chapter 9A.52 RCW,as \'[t]o ignore a definition section is to refuse to give legal effect to a part of the statutory law of the state'\ (quoting State V. Taylor, 30 Wn. App. 89, 95, 632 P.2d 892(1981))
- recognizing title-level \building\ definition applies to burglary statute under chapter 9A.52 RCW,as \'[t]o ignore a definition section is to refuse to give legal effect to a part of the statutory law of the state'\ (quoting State V. Taylor, 30 Wn. App. 89, 95, 632 P.2d 892(1981))
- a word in a statute will be given its ordinary meaning unless it is defined in the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-13· cited 29×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-07· cited 25×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-04-18· cited 22×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-28· cited 16×
- Summers v. FeatherD. Oregon· 2015-08-05· cited 1×
- State v. JosephWashington Supreme Court· 2017-11-22
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,240×
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 186×
- State v. ShippWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-15· cited 146×
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court· 1967-02-02· cited 124×
- State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 115×
- Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-07-05· cited 104×
- City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court· 1973-09-27· cited 81×
- State v. RhodesWashington Supreme Court· 1979-10-11· cited 72×
- State v. ErmertWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-11· cited 68×
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court· 1967-07-27· cited 61×
- Burlingame v. Consolidated Mines and Smelting Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court· 1986-07-03· cited 48×
- City of Spokane v. VauxWashington Supreme Court· 1973-11-29· cited 37×
- State v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-06-10· cited 30×
- State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-13· cited 25×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-04· cited 17×
- State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-07· cited 17×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-01· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.