State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere fact that defendants broke into same store on prior occasions does not establish signature without further evidence of unique modus operandi
• no actual conflict of interest existed where defense counsel had previously represented a State' s witness
• where defendant claimed to be too intoxicated to form the required intent, evidence that he had earlier committed an identical crime is admissible to prove intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinley
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2015-03-13· cited 42×
• State v. Hunsaker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-02· cited 37×
• State v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-17· cited 36×
• State v. Couch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-06-10· cited 30×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-16· cited 26×
• State v. Vicuna
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-03· cited 23×
• State v. Wheeler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-24· cited 11×
• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-03· cited 5×
• Amended May 21, 2015 State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle Mckinley
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2015-03-13

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cuyler v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
• United States v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
• State v. Coe
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 231×
• State v. Saltarelli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 227×
• State v. Bergeron
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 220×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 155×
• State v. Laureano
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 138×
• State v. Castro
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-07-16· cited 22×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-17· cited 11×