Court of Appeals of Utah· 4/21/1994
State v. Cosey
Citations
- 873 P.2d 1177
- 237 Utah Adv. Rep. 46
- 1994 Utah App. LEXIS 63
- 1994 WL 143753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of a drastic change in the victim's behavior is relevant circumstantial evidence that a traumatic experience has occurred
- holding that testimony from a mother about “a drastic change in the victim’s behavior [was] relevant circumstantial evidence that a traumatic experience such as rape” had occurred
- “Evidence of a drastic change in the victim’s behavior is relevant circumstantial evidence that a traumatic experience such as rape has occurred.”
- “Evidence of a drastic change in the victim’s behavior is relevant circumstantial evidence that a traumatic experience such as rape has occurred.”
- commenting on same difficulty and summarizing cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orme, Bench, Russon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 207×
- Dickerson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 72×
- Palacio v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 42×
- State v. StrainCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-17· cited 24×
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-07-13· cited 20×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2010-11-18· cited 19×
- Ronald Leroy King v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-04-21· cited 19×
- State v. WinwardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-06-12· cited 18×
- State v. StringhamCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-04-23· cited 17×
- State v. FixelCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-09-05· cited 15×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2010-12-30· cited 15×
- State v. Beltran-FelixCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 14×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-08· cited 13×
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-03-03· cited 11×
- State v. DeverCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. LabrumCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-08-16· cited 10×
- Salt Lake City v. GrotepasCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-29· cited 9×
- People v. MenaColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06· cited 9×
- State v. Perez-AvilaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-02-24· cited 7×
- Carrier v. Pro-Tech RestorationCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-12-21· cited 6×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-03· cited 205×
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court· 1992-01-29· cited 203×
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 195×
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court· 1990-12-07· cited 158×
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-01· cited 147×
- State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 92×
- State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-03-26· cited 83×
- Jesus Romero, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1989-10-05· cited 69×
- State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 64×
- State v. GrayUtah Supreme Court· 1986-04-10· cited 63×
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court· 1990-02-08· cited 59×
- State v. ReserSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 51×
- State v. MaurerUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 50×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.