Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/5/2000
State v. Cooper
Citations
- 342 S.C. 389
- 536 S.E.2d 870
- 2000 S.C. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the State's failure to list the final judgment in its notice of appeal did not preclude the court's review of intermediate and post-judgment orders
- trial judge has inherent authority to require expert examination of defendant and order state to pay in order to maintain integrity of judicial process
- \[T]he trial judge in this case has the inherent authority to require an expert examination of an indigent and direct which party should pay for the examination.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hooper v. RockwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-22· cited 91×
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 66×
- State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 49×
- Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-07· cited 35×
- Baber v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 23×
- Cox v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-10-19· cited 18×
- Lancaster Ex Rel. Estate of Davis v. FielderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 8×
- Pelzer Manuf. Co. v. CelySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1894-01-22· cited 8×
- Kearney v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-12-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.