Skip to main content
· 7/21/1997

Baber v. Greenville County

Citations

  • 488 S.E.2d 314
  • 327 S.C. 31
  • 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 151
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the conduct of a trial is largely within the trial judge’s sound discretion, the exercise of which will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion or the commission of a legal error that results in prejudice for appellant
  • finding an issue not yet presented to the Tax Commission not ripe for appellate review
  • finding mandamus issue not ripe for appellate review because it had not been presented to the Tax Commission
  • explaining \[t]he denial of summary judgment is interlocutory\ and \is not a final order\
  • “Absent a proffer, it is impossible for this Court to determine the effect of the excluded testimony.”
  • “Absent a proffer, it is impossible for this Court to determine the effect of the excluded testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles, Curtis, Finney, Shaw, Toal, Waller, Whetstone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.