Skip to main content
· 2/1/1993

Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.

Citations

  • 426 S.E.2d 777
  • 310 S.C. 330
  • 1993 S.C. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an order is a final judgment that may immediately be appealed when there is no further act to be done by the court prior to a determination of the rights of the parties
  • teaching that an order is interlocutory “[i]f there is some further act which must be done by the court prior to a determination of the rights of the parties ... or [i]f a judg ment determines the applicable law while leaving open questions of fact”
  • explaining an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction \is interlocutory and not directly appealable\
  • explaining an order is interlocutory if some further act must be done by the court prior to the determination of the rights of the parties
  • stating an order is interlocutory if some further act must be done by the court prior to the determination of the rights of the parties
  • there is no “other evidence” requirement for personal jurisdiction where the complaint itself demonstrates jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.