Hooper v. Rockwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “any order issued as a result of a merit hearing, as well as any later order issued with regard to a treatment, placement, or permanent plan, is a final order that a party must timely appeal”
• explaining article I, section 10 privacy interests are \not absolute\ but must be balanced against the State's interests
• providing a party “may not appeal [a] consent order because such orders are not appealable”
• explaining article I, section 10 privacy interests are \not absolute\ but must be balanced against the State's interests
• providing a party must \timely appeal any subsequent orders of the family court regarding the custody of [the] children or the treatment plan\ for the appellate court to consider it
• finding the South Carolina emergency protective custody statute does not violate the federal constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).