State v. Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state constitutional law governing searches has no extraterritorial effect and evidence lawfully obtained by Ohio police was admissible in Kentucky
• “As in arrest we look to the state of search and seizure to determine validity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 57×
• Menefee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-02-19· cited 38×
• State v. Torres
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-08-09· cited 28×
• State v. Bridges
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-07· cited 26×
• United States v. Gerena
  D. Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 17×
• State v. Rector
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 8×
• City of Junction City v. Riley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-01-16· cited 8×
• State v. McConnell
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1984-09-06· cited 5×
• State v. Torres
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-04-19· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Blood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1963-01-26· cited 38×
• Satterlee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-04-14· cited 36×
• State v. Mims
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-05-14· cited 28×
• State v. Shienle
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-01-24· cited 19×
• Cheatham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1971-02-03· cited 15×