Skip to main content

Doe v. State

Citations

  • 189 P.3d 999
  • 2008 Alas. LEXIS 109
  • 2008 WL 2853565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that six of the Kennedy factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive
  • holding that the United States Supreme Court’s “intent-effects test provides an appropriate analytical framework” under the Alaska Constitution
  • concluding that quarterly in-person verification is an affirmative disability or restraint that \treats offenders not much differently than the state treats probationers and parolees subject to continued state supervision\
  • holding that ASORA violates the ex post facto clause as applied to those who committed their underlying sex offense before ASORA's enactment
  • deciding that ASORA is punitive for purposes of ex post facto clause and may not be applied retroactively
  • holding that Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act (ASORA) violates ex post facto clause when applied to a person who committed the underlying sex offense before ASORA's enactment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.