State v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unless defendant moves for judgment of acquittal at end of trial, insufficiency of evidence claim will not be preserved
• “A [trial] court should move for acquittal only when the record reveals that the evidence is so tenuous that a conviction would be unconscionable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cole
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 61×
• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-01-27· cited 45×
• State v. LaFlam
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-21· cited 22×
• State v. Erwin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-04-07· cited 17×
• State v. Dion
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-01· cited 13×
• State v. Penn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-12-11· cited 11×
• State v. Greenslet
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-08-30· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Morrill
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-01· cited 82×
• State v. Welch
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-10-05· cited 32×
• United States v. Gary Russell Bullock
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-05-16· cited 31×
• State v. Bressette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-06-06· cited 17×
• State v. Winters
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-09-14· cited 8×