Skip to main content
· 2/28/1983

State v. Fanger

Citations

  • 663 P.2d 120
  • 34 Wash. App. 635
  • 1983 Wash. App. LEXIS 2407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant expressly waived their right to a CrR 3.5 hearing by stipulating to admission of their statements
  • defense counsel authorized to waive procedural matters such as a CrR 3.5 hearing on behalf ofthe client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ringold, Williams, Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.