Skip to main content

State v. Waller

Citations

  • 299 Kan. 707
  • 328 P.3d 1111
  • 2014 WL 2557163
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the holding in Hitt is limited to juvenile adjudications which were final before June 20, 2008, because a later case found juveniles had a constitutional right to a jury trial
  • “Appellate courts reviewing the second part for an injustice may take a broader view than the trial court because appellate courts may examine the entire record.”
  • \Appellate courts reviewing the second part for an injustice may take a broader view than the trial court because appellate courts may examine the entire record.\
  • \Appellate courts reviewing the second part for an injustice may take a broader view than the trial court because appellate courts may examine the entire record.\
  • “An issue not briefed is deemed waived and abandoned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.