Skip to main content

State v. Cockerham

Citations

  • 365 S.E.2d 22
  • 294 S.C. 380
  • 1988 S.C. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s indirect reference to defendant’s silence and indirect comments on defendant’s exercise of his rights to counsel and jury trial violated defendant’s due process rights and were reversible error in murder and kidnaping trial
  • holding the prosecutor's indirect reference to a defendant's silence impermissibly commented on his right not to testify
  • Solicitor commented that defendant depended on the jurors’ “soft underbellies], lack of courage,” and “lack of commitment” to not give him the death penalty
  • error to refer to jury's \soft underbelly\ and lack of courage and commitment
  • error to refer to jury’s “soft underbelly” and lack of courage and commitment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.