Skip to main content
· 7/15/2014

Scheck Industrial Corporation v. Tarlton Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.

Citations

  • 435 S.W.3d 705
  • 2014 WL 3428402
  • 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The party claiming damages bears the burden to establish the existence and amount of damages within a reasonable degree of certainty.”
  • “Under the rule of mitigation of damages, one damaged through [the] alleged breach by another of some legal duty or obligation has to make reasonable efforts to minimize the resulting damage.”
  • “Under the rule of mitigation of damages, one damaged through [the] alleged breach by another of some legal duty or obligation has to make reasonable efforts to minimize the resulting damage.” (cleaned up)
  • “[t]he trial court's findings as to damages are entitled great weight and this Court will not disturb these findings unless the damages awarded are clearly wrong, could not have been reasonably determined, or were excessive”
  • “[t]he trial court’s findings as to damages are entitled great weight and this Court will not disturb these findings unless the damages awarded are clearly wrong, could not have been reasonably determined, or were excessive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hess, Van Amburg Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.