State v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State having failed to prove that the alleged kidnapping occurred in Kootenai County, Idaho, jurisdiction did not exist in the State of Idaho to try this case.”
• “The State having failed to prove that the alleged kidnapping occurred in Kootenai County, Idaho, jurisdiction did not exist in the state of Idaho to try this case.”
• continued retention of children out of the forum state, beyond the date on which they were to be returned to the Department of Social Services in the forum state, could not be prosecuted under the state’s kidnapping statute, as no element of the offense occurred in the forum state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wheat v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-03-27· cited 26×
• Trindle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-16· cited 21×
• Vasquez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-02-09· cited 19×
• State v. Cochran
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-07-30· cited 17×
• State v. Dudley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-14· cited 17×
• State v. Doyle
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 15×
• State v. Kane
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-06-09· cited 15×
• State v. Chapman
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-06-26· cited 9×
• Kerr v. Watson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-08-18· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Buffum
  California Supreme Court· 1953-04-20· cited 180×
• State v. Losolla
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-06-23· cited 40×
• State v. Mowrey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-06-29· cited 26×
• State v. Shannon
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-03-09· cited 22×
• People v. Bormann
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-04-02· cited 7×