State v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find these cases to be unpersuasivé. [The Idaho statute] makes no distinction between temporary or permanent ‘lawful care or control thereof.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sorrendino
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 25×
• State v. Chapman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-04-23· cited 19×
• State v. Doyle
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 15×
• Paul R. Ferrell v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-02-10· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Hyatt
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-07-08· cited 21×
• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1962-07-10· cited 20×
• State v. Cochran
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-07-24· cited 13×
• People v. Fields
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-11-04· cited 9×
• State v. Seekford
  Utah Supreme Court· 1981-11-03· cited 7×