State v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he test for joinder is whether the offenses charged are alleged to have been part of a connected series of acts or transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Field
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-07-31· cited 286×
• State v. Caudill
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-03-15· cited 156×
• State v. Abel
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 62×
• State v. Gamble
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-07-23· cited 24×
• State v. Dambrell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-08-19· cited 22×
• State v. Cook
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-10-05· cited 20×
• State v. Anderson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-23· cited 14×
• State v. Fox
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-09-09· cited 13×
• State v. Martinez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-11-14· cited 10×
• State v. Steele
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-10-30· cited 7×
• State v. Hayes
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-11-01· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schaffer v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-05-16· cited 474×
• United States v. Roselli
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-09-28· cited 225×
• McElroy v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1896-11-02· cited 169×
• State v. Shepherd
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-10· cited 74×
• State v. Thomas
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-10-20· cited 68×
• United States v. Michael Bova
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-04-26· cited 40×
• State v. Roderick
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-11-02· cited 33×
• State v. Cochran
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-07-24· cited 13×