Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/2/2023
State v. Clemmons
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1832
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. Appellant did not establish that he had been unavoidably prevented from discovering evidence regarding the grand jury foreperson's signature. Even if the motion were allowed, the trial court could not grant a new trial based on the alleged defect in the indictment. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-26· cited 14×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-13· cited 5×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-02· cited 4×
- State v. ShutwayOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 3×
- State v. GapenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-17· cited 3×
- State v. ClemmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-07· cited 1×
- Jones v. StateWood Circuit Court· 1897-04-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.