Skip to main content

State v. Clemmons

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1832

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. Appellant did not establish that he had been unavoidably prevented from discovering evidence regarding the grand jury foreperson's signature. Even if the motion were allowed, the trial court could not grant a new trial based on the alleged defect in the indictment. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.