State v. Clark

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 559

Syllabus

Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not plainly err by keeping a particular juror on the jury. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a cash withdrawal slip, a calendar, or a spreadsheet into evidence, or by excluding the testimony of a defense witness. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the indictment included technical errors, that she received ineffective assistance of counsel, or that the trial court's questions to witnesses amounted to plain error. As appellant had served her prison sentence, appellant's contention that the trial court erred by sentencing her to a term of prison was moot.