State v. Six

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 4361

Syllabus

R.C. 2903.06(A)(4) Crim.R. 3 Crim.R. 7 Plain Error Crim.R. 16. Defendant-appellant's conviction for vehicular manslaughter was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Although the complaint was lacking because it neither identified the predicate offense by reference to its statute number nor contained words sufficient to give defendant-appellant notice of the predicate offense for the vehicular manslaughter charge, defendant-appellant did not demonstrate the outcome at trial would have been different. Any error in the trial judge's questioning of an expert witness, assuming there was error, was harmless.