State v. Christenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because this court is limited in its function to correcting errors it cannot create public policy.” (quotation omitted)
• “Because this court is limited in its function to correcting errors it cannot create public policy.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rochin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
• United States v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
• Hampton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
• State v. Lothenbach
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
• United States v. Angela Nolan-Cooper
  Third Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 166×
• United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy Freeman
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-03· cited 158×
• United States v. Barrera-Moreno
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-12-17· cited 124×
• United States v. Curtis Miller
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-12-18· cited 108×
• Vincent Realty Corp. v. City of Boston
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-07-13· cited 98×
• United States v. Glen Shoffner, Richard Henry Fiedler, and Leonard Michael Stange, Defendants
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-08-11· cited 75×
• LaChapelle v. Mitten
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-03-14· cited 53×
• United States v. Dale H. Prairie
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-10· cited 43×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-02-16· cited 22×
• State v. Antrim
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-04-07· cited 14×
• State v. Morris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-11-03· cited 9×
• State v. Crist
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-05-18· cited 8×
• State v. James
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-04-28· cited 6×
• State v. Burkland
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-11-24· cited 4×