State v. Crist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that due process was violated when an undercover officer exposed himself to a suspect during a prostitution investigation
• affirming the trial court’s determination that no entrapment existed because the evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant initiated the criminal activity and was predisposed to commit prostitution
• affirming the trial court's determination that no entrapment existed because the evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant initiated the criminal activity and was predisposed to commit prostitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Oanes
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-02-06· cited 10×
• State v. Ketter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-03-19· cited 6×
• State v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-06-14· cited 5×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-01-07· cited 4×
• State v. Burkland
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-11-24· cited 4×
• State v. Christenson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-11-26· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Grilli
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-05-09· cited 50×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-02-16· cited 22×
• State v. Morris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-11-03· cited 9×