State v. Antrim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant’s rule 26.01 waiver must be “personal, explicit, and in accordance with [the] rule” (quotation omitted)
• reversing and remanding for invalid waiver in a rule 26.01, subd. 4 proceeding, requiring strict adherence to rule requirements
• reversing and remanding without addressing the pretrial issue that was preserved for review, where defendant had not validly waived his right to require favorable witnesses to testify
• strictly construing waiver requirements in rule 26.01

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).