State v. Burkland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the James factors are not directly applicable” to a “sex-for-money exchange involving intimate activities on the part of the buyer and seller”
• declining to apply the James factors “because the nature of a controlled-substance investigation differs significantly from that of a prostitution investigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).