Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 7/7/2006
State v. Chesson
Citations
- 948 So. 2d 566
- 2006 WL 1874761
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that State did not promptly institute forfeiture proceedings given 14-week delay between the seizure of the property and the filing of the State's complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryan, Crawley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cowart v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-03-14· cited 1×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2014-03-07· cited 1×
- Hitchcock v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2012-09-28
- Green v. City of Montgomery, 2100713 (ala.civ.app. 9-16-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-09-16
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-02-02· cited 169×
- Eleven Automobiles v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-06-18· cited 30×
- Ex Parte McConathySupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-03-04· cited 22×
- Reach v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1988-07-22· cited 18×
- Winstead v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1979-08-08· cited 18×
- Moynes v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1989-10-18· cited 16×
- Adams v. State Ex Rel. WhetstoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-04-03· cited 15×
- State v. $17,636.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-07-08· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.