Cowart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing judgment of forfeiture, stating: “The State, in this ease, has offered no reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the forfeiture complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Hall v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2014-03-07· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eleven Automobiles v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-06-18· cited 30×
• Lightfoot v. Floyd
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1995-08-04· cited 25×
• Ex Parte McConathy
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2005-03-04· cited 22×
• Reach v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-07-22· cited 18×
• Winstead v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1979-08-08· cited 18×
• Kirkland v. State Ex Rel. Baxley
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-10-27· cited 16×
• Moynes v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1989-10-18· cited 16×
• Adams v. State Ex Rel. Whetstone
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-04-03· cited 15×
• State v. $17,636.00 in United States Currency
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-07-08· cited 10×
• $3,011 in United States Currency v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2002-04-26· cited 9×
• $1,113.77 US Currency v. State, Escambia Cty.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1992-05-22· cited 5×
• State v. Chesson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2006-07-07· cited 5×