Supreme Court of Alabama· 2/2/1996

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Skelton

Citations

675 So. 2d 377
1996 Ala. LEXIS 22
1996 WL 40388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that when material facts are undisputed, an appeal concerns the application of the law to those facts and no presumption of correctness attaches to the trial court's judgment
indicating that when essentially undisputed facts are presented and the parties' controversy involves questions of law for the court to consider, the trial court's judgment carries no presumption of correctness
“No reasonable standard would suggest that an automobile insurer intended to insure against such acts.”
`[W]here the facts before the trial court are essentially undisputed and the controversy involves questions of law for the court to consider, the [trial] court's judgment carries no presumption of correctness.'
insured’s injuries from battery by another motorist after they had exited their vehicles did not “arise out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of an uninsured auto”
'[W]here the facts before the trial court are essentially undisputed and the controversy involves questions of law for the court to consider, the [trial] court's judgment *Page 255 carries no presumption of correctness.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shores

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

145 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.