Skip to main content
· 3/4/2005

Ex Parte McConathy

Citations

  • 911 So. 2d 677
  • 2005 WL 503570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a forfeiture judgment in an action in which the defendant presented testimony, that the State did not refute, that he had prescriptions for at least some of the pills and in which there was no concrete evidence tying the seized $8,000 to a specific drug transaction, past or future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stuart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.