Skip to main content

State v. Chakerian

Citations

  • 900 P.2d 511
  • 135 Or. App. 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute prohibiting conduct causing a great risk of “public alarm” was not unconstitutionally vague because it imposed a “collective and communal” standard
  • riot statute focused on preventing specific harm of causing “grave risk of public alarm” where that effect was element of offense
  • riot statute focused on preventing specific harm of causing \grave risk of public alarm\ where that effect was element of offense
  • laws that fall into the “third category” under State v. Robertson, 293 Or 402, 649 P2d 569 (1982)—those that regulate forbid- den effects without referring to expression at all—are not subject to overbreadth challenges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consolidated, Deits, De Muniz Hasel-Ton, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.