State v. Norris-Romine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that term “no legitimate purpose” rendered stalking statute unconstitutionally vague where State conceded that statute did not inform person of ordinary intelligence what conduct was prohibited
• stalking statute struck down as unconstitutionally vague because of the vagueness of the term \legitimate purpose\
• concluding the phrase \legitimate purpose\ was unconstitutionally vague
• concluding the phrase “legitimate purpose” was unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).