Arizona Supreme Court· 6/25/2003

State v. Casey

Citations

71 P.3d 351
205 Ariz. 359
2003 Ariz. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the power to create affirmative defenses lies with the legislature
stating that interpretation of the state constitution is the courts’ province
statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and party challenging statute must show it infringes on constitu tional guarantee or violates constitutional principle
clauses in Arizona Constitution usually interpreted in conformity with similar clauses of United States Constitution
burden of persuasion on affirmative defenses “may fall on either the government or the defendant, as determined by statute or court decision”
statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and party challenging statute must show it infringes on constitutional guarantee or violates constitutional principle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, McGregor, O'Neil, Berch, Ryan, Arizona, Howard, County, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.