Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 29

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, res judicata. The applicant has filed a timely application for reopening pursuant to App.R. 26(B). The doctrine of res judicata, however, bars further review of the applicant's sole proposed assignment of error in support of his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The applicant's proposed assignment of error was previously reviewed on appeal and found to be without merit. We further find that the application of the doctrine of res judicata is not unjust and thus deny the application for reopening.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.