· 11/4/2009
State v. Saine
Citations
- 297 S.W.3d 199
- 2009 Tenn. LEXIS 708
- 2009 WL 3631011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the automobile exception requires probable cause but does not require a separate finding of exigency
- recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
- recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
- recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
- recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
- recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holder, Clark, Wade, Koch, Lee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.