Skip to main content
· 11/4/2009

State v. Saine

Citations

  • 297 S.W.3d 199
  • 2009 Tenn. LEXIS 708
  • 2009 WL 3631011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the automobile exception requires probable cause but does not require a separate finding of exigency
  • recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
  • recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
  • recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
  • recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”
  • recognizing that an affidavit in support of a search warrant “must show a nexus among the criminal activity, the place to be searched, and the items to be seized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holder, Clark, Wade, Koch, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.