State v. Tigano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing mistrial motion based on jury misconduct for abuse of discretion
• information not revealed during voir dire is prejudicial if it would have provided the objective basis needed to challenge for cause
• failure of a juror to disclose that she had heard pre-trial publicity about a case did not warrant a new trial because the juror's knowledge would not have supported a challenge for cause
• information known during voir dire but not revealed upon request will be prejudicial if it is material and would have provided the objective basis needed to challenge for cause
• failure of a juror to disclose that she had heard pretrial publicity about a case did not warrant a new trial because the juror’s knowledge would not have supported a challenge for cause
• impeachment may focus on time of event or time of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).