Breckenridge v. Valley General Hosp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is jury misconduct for jurors to interject extrinsic evidence in jury deliberations
• \`The individual or collective thought processes leading to a verdict `inhere in the verdict' and cannot be used to impeach a jury verdict.'\ (quoting State v. Ng, 110 Wash.2d 32, 43, 750 P.2d 632 (1988))
• “ ‘The individual or collective thought processes leading to a verdict “inhere in the verdict” and cannot be used to impeach a jury verdict.’ ” (quoting State v. Ng, 110 Wn.2d 32, 43, 750 P.2d 632 (1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).