Alaska Supreme Court· 3/25/2011

State v. Carlin

Citations

249 P.3d 752
2011 Alas. LEXIS 18
2011 WL 1086470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that plurality of states follow abatement rule but disapproving it for Alaska
holding that a deceased defendant’s appeal was not moot
discussing financial consequences to defendants’ estates and the interests of victims “in condemning the offender”
“[R]elying on the presumption of guilt after conviction to leave the conviction intact is contrary to the defendant’s right to appeal.”
“[R]elying on the presumption of guilt after conviction to leave the conviction intact is contrary to the defendant’s right to appeal.”
considering \the growing number of states that have rejected\ a proposition of law in holding that \the 'changed conditions' element of the test for overruling precedent is satisfied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Winfree, Christen, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.