Montana Supreme Court· 2/14/2012
State v. Benn
Citations
- 2012 MT 33
- 364 Mont. 153
- 274 P.3d 47
- 2012 WL 458609
- 2012 Mont. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abandoning abatement, but only allowing for appeal of issues not rendered moot by defendant's death, like challenge to restitution order
- discontinuing application of abatement ab initio, noting the negative impact on crime victims
- discontinuing application of abatement ab initio , noting the negative impact on crime victims
- “[A] restitution condition imposed within a criminal judgment may be enforceable by victims against the defendant’s estate.”
- “[A] restitution condition imposed within a criminal judgment may be enforceable by victims against the defendant’s estate.”
- “A challenge on appeal to the amount of restitution ordered by the sentence, for example, may remain a viable and concrete issue for which this Court would be able to grant effective relief between the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Cotter, Baker, Wheat
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court· 2012-04-10· cited 38×
- State v. HollisterSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-01· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-03-13· cited 21×
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-02· cited 14×
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court· 2018-11-20· cited 12×
- State of Arizona v. Richard J. GlasselArizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 5×
- City v. MagrawMontana Supreme Court· 2013-05-07
- R. Eva v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2018-01-16
- State of Tennessee v. Hassan Falah Al Mutory - Concurring in part and Dissenting in partTennessee Supreme Court· 2019-08-07
- State of Tennessee v. Hassan Falah Al MutoryTennessee Supreme Court· 2019-08-07
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,718×
- Plan Helena, Inc. v. Helena Regional Airport Authority BoardMontana Supreme Court· 2010-02-09· cited 63×
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 2009-10-30· cited 58×
- State v. GiddingsMontana Supreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 41×
- Surland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-11· cited 40×
- State v. DevinWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 40×
- Formicove, Inc. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1983-12-20· cited 38×
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-03-25· cited 35×
- State v. KorsenIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-04-01· cited 23×
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-01-07· cited 20×
- DeVoe v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 1997-03-10· cited 19×
- Gateway Opencut Mining Action Group v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court· 2011-08-17· cited 14×
- State v. HollandMontana Supreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12×
- State v. SmerkerMontana Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 10×
- Ex Parte Estate of CookSupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-07-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.