United States v. Charles E. Moehlenkamp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is against the interests of justice for a person to \stand convicted without resolution of the merits of his appeal\
• court followed its “established practice by dismissing [the] appeal as moot, vacating the conviction . . . , and remanding the case to the district court for dismissal of the outstanding indictment[.]”
• death 3 of defendant during pendency of appeal of right from final judgment of conviction deprives accused of right to appellate decision and requires vacating of conviction and dismissal of indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).