Skip to main content

State v. Cantrell

Citations

  • 758 P.2d 1
  • 111 Wash. 2d 385
  • 1988 Wash. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[i]njury is an essential element of a due process claim, as it is of any claim”
  • recognizing that the exercise of CrR 8.3(b
  • State's delay of over 2 months in filing escape charges against a juvenile, which delay did not prejudice the defendant, was insufficient grounds upon which to dismiss the charges under CrR 8.3
  • CrR 8.3(b) is designed to protect against arbitrary action or misconduct but does not grant the court the authority to substitute its judgment for that of the prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach, Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.