Skip to main content
· 5/11/2010

Rentschler v. Nixon

Citations

  • 311 S.W.3d 783
  • 2010 WL 1332432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Missouri board of probation and parole has always “retained plenary discretion as to whether to issue a conditional release date”
  • \The person challenging the validity of the statute has the burden of proving the act clearly and undoubtedly violates the constitutional limitations.\
  • “The board’s consideration of granting conditional release to any of the inmates [is] a mere possibility, nothing more. It is insufficient to support a claim for the creation of a disability.”
  • “The board of probation and parole has plenary discretion in granting conditional release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.