Romeo v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether [the] [respondents made an illegal, improper, [and] perverted use of process”
• holding that “genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether [the] [r]espondents made an illegal, improper, [and] perverted use of process”
• summary judgment against Romeos in abuse-of-process suit not appropriate when evidence showed Jones specifically stated 6 prior lawsuit was “to shut [the Romeos] up”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).