State v. Campoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s performance on FSTs, though not conclusive, is “relevant evidence of [the] defendant’s impairment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shadden
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-09· cited 119×
• State v. Beltran-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-06· cited 20×
• Bravo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-05-28· cited 11×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. Salazar
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
• State v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 185×
• Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 145×
• ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-06· cited 114×
• Fuenning v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 92×
• State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of Mesa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-10-11· cited 56×
• State v. Velasco
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 33×
• Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-11-30· cited 22×
• State v. Askren
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-11-14· cited 7×
• State v. Esser
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23· cited 5×