Skip to main content
· 2/6/2004

ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini

Citations

  • 83 P.3d 1103
  • 207 Ariz. 162
  • 418 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 60
  • 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that breach of contract claim includes the element of damages
  • holding contract action claim for damages subject to jury trial right and citing Perkins v. Komarnyckyj, 172 Ariz. 115, 118, 834 P.2d 1260, 1263 (1992
  • noting, “in an action based on breach of contract, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the existence of a contract, breach of the contract, and resulting damages”
  • holding contract action claim for damages subject to jury trial right and citing Perkins v. Komarnyckyj, 172 Ariz. 115, 118, 834 P.2d 1260, 1263 (1992), which held that parties in malpractice action have right to have every issue tried by jury that has been empaneled
  • accepting special-action jurisdiction, in part, to avoid “unnecessary expenditure of time and money”
  • describing the elements of a breach of contract claim under Arizona law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa, Pelander, Eckerstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.