Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of Flagstaff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it is reasonable to update sign to indicate new tenants because such a change does not substantially alter or expand the nonconforming signs
• purpose of § 9-462.02(A) “‘is to prevent the injustice of forcing retroactive compliance and the doubtful constitutionality of compelling immediate discontinuance of a nonconforming use’”
• limiting de novo review to questions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).