Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/28/2000
State v. Cain
Citations
- 757 A.2d 142
- 360 Md. 205
- 2000 Md. LEXIS 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he courts of a state have territorial jurisdiction of a crime involving misappropriation of property if the accused had a preexisting obligation to account for the property in that state.”
- “It is sometimes stated that each offense has, for jurisdictional purposes, one key act or omission and that this element must have taken place in the state where the prosecution is instituted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-03· cited 51×
- State v. SimionSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 28×
- Fontaine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-01· cited 13×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-30· cited 5×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-28· cited 5×
- State v. LeffingwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-22· cited 5×
- Randall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-01· cited 4×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-28· cited 2×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-11-17· cited 87×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-10· cited 55×
- Fraidin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-11· cited 52×
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-01· cited 47×
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-03-22· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-12· cited 41×
- Urciolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-10· cited 37×
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-09· cited 36×
- People v. HaynesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors· 1835-12-15· cited 33×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-07-06· cited 33×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-19· cited 32×
- Brown v. Market Development, Inc.Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County· 1974-02-21· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. SchmunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-01-04· cited 22×
- State v. HilpertNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-02-25· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1870-10-15· cited 13×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1924-02-04· cited 10×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-23· cited 8×
- Conte & Co., Inc. v. StephanD. Kansas· 1989-05-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.