Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the traditional rule of territorial jurisdiction is that “a state will exercise jurisdiction over a crime only if some conduct or effect constituting a part of that crime was committed within the state”
• court had jurisdiction over theft charge when defendant had \duty to account\ for property in Maryland
• “jurisdiction over a theft offense exists in this state if the defendant was subject to a duty to account for the property within this state. * * * The duty to account will sustain jurisdiction only where such a duty is an essential component of the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Khalifa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-03· cited 51×
• State v. Simion
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 28×
• State v. Cain
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-28· cited 12×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-30· cited 5×
• Randall v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-01· cited 4×
• (2000)
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2000-04-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martel v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-01-20· cited 47×
• Bowen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-01· cited 47×
• Urciolo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-10· cited 37×
• State v. Roderick
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-12-10· cited 15×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1961-11-01· cited 6×