Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/19/1999
State v. Butler
Citations
- 724 A.2d 657
- 353 Md. 67
- 1999 Md. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The roots of the territorial juris diction requirement lie in the Sixth Amendment....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30· cited 140×
- People v. BettsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-01-13· cited 70×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 60×
- Torres v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-04-08· cited 54×
- Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-03· cited 51×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
- Estrada v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-08-26· cited 18×
- Fontaine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-01· cited 13×
- State v. CainCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-28· cited 12×
- People v. Hugo G.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-11· cited 9×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-05· cited 8×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-30· cited 8×
- State v. PughLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-05-27· cited 6×
- In Re Antonette H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-08-31· cited 6×
- United States v. Juan Melgar-HernandezD.C. Circuit· 2016-08-09· cited 6×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-28· cited 5×
- Randall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-01· cited 4×
- Toler v. McGinnisSixth Circuit· 2001-09-25· cited 4×
- People v. BettsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-15· cited 2×
- Burton v. Mumford, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-08· cited 2×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 319×
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-11-23· cited 107×
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-25· cited 106×
- People v. CavanaughCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-04-12· cited 105×
- Breeding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-08· cited 99×
- State v. WilloughbyArizona Supreme Court· 1995-03-23· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-03-19· cited 83×
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-12-16· cited 79×
- Scott Et Al. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-05· cited 78×
- State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 72×
- Grimes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 66×
- Sumpter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-01-22· cited 63×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
- Martel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-01-20· cited 47×
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-01· cited 47×
- People v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 46×
- People v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-11-21· cited 40×
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 38×
- Urciolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-10· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.