Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/10/1995
Walker v. State
Citations
- 338 Md. 253
- 658 A.2d 239
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that whether defense counsel's representation of two co-defendants constituted a conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel’s performance was best determined in a post-conviction proceeding rather than on direct review
- concluding that whether defense counsel's representation of two co-defendants constituted a conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel's performance was best determined in a post-conviction proceeding rather than on direct review
- stating that \[w]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court\
- stating that “[w]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court”
- stating that “[W]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court.”
- stating that \[W]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-09· cited 143×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-18· cited 99×
- Livesay v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-19· cited 97×
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-13· cited 92×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-28· cited 82×
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-10· cited 64×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-26· cited 64×
- Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-16· cited 60×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 49×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-26· cited 39×
- Stoddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-08· cited 38×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-26· cited 38×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-15· cited 36×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-23· cited 36×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-10· cited 35×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-04· cited 30×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-13· cited 29×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-10· cited 24×
- Burch v. United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-07· cited 24×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-13· cited 239×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-07· cited 143×
- County Council v. OffenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-18· cited 67×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-03-12· cited 30×
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-30· cited 20×
- Wagstaff v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-12-03· cited 12×
- Diekhoff v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.